You will need to provide some examples of hot topics you can apply during your medical school interviews. Here you will learn everything about the Charlie Gard case - including ethical implications and some example medicine interview questions and model answers for you to look at.
Combine your reading here with medicine interview tutoring to boost your answers and delivery.
✅ Charlie Gard Case Summary
Charlie Gard was a baby who was born in the UK with a rare genetic condition called mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome.
Charlie's parents looked for alternative/experimental treatments for their son, but the hospital that was treating him thought that the treatment would not be effective and that further medical intervention would not necessarily help Charlie.
The case was taken to court, where the judge ruled in agreement with Great Ormond Street Hospital and allowed them to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for Charlie.
The decision was appealed by Charlie's parents, but ultimately the decision was upheld by the courts, and Charlie's life support was eventually withdrawn.
❓What happened in the Charlie Gard case?
Charlie Gard was born in August 2016 with a rare genetic disorder called infantile onset encephalomyopathy and mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome (MDDS). Learn more here.
This condition caused Charlie to have muscle weakness and severe developmental delays, and left him unable to move, see, hear, or breathe on his own. He required support for all of these.
In March 2017, doctors at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) in London, where Charlie was being treated, recommended that life-support be withdrawn; they argued that further treatment would not necessarily help (it would be futile) and would cause Charlie unnecessary suffering. They believed he should be allowed to die with dignity and that the experimental treatment was not medically necessary.
Charlie Gard's parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard disagreed with this decision and they sought to gain permission to take him to the USA for an experimental treatment called Nucleoside Bypass Therapy (NBT).
In this treatment synthetic versions of naturally-occurring substances in the body called nucleosides, which are essential building blocks for DNA and RNA, are given to patients. These have the potential to help restore the body's ability to produce both RNA and DNA, which therefore has the potential to improve symptoms and prolong life in patients with certain genetic disorders such as mitochondrial depletion syndrome.
The Charlie Gard case gained national and international attention, with Charlie's parents receiving support from a number of famous individuals such as the Pope.
The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, where Charlie's parents were unsuccessful in their appeal for Charlie's right to receive experimental treatment abroad. The court ruled that it was too late for Charlie to benefit from this medical intervention and he should instead be allowed to die peacefully and with dignity in the UK.
In April 2017, the UK courts ruled in favour of GOSH and authorised the withdrawal of life support, despite the objections of Charlie Gard's parents. The parents appealed the decision, but their appeal was ultimately unsuccessful.
Charlie Gard died on July 28, 2017, five days after life support was withdrawn. Charlie Gard's death sparked intense debate over similar cases, ethics, law, human rights and the allocation of medical resources.
Charlie Gard's funeral was held at Great St Mary's Church in London, where thousands of people paid their respects to Charlie and his family. Charlie Gard's parents have since set up the Charlie Gard Foundation to give other children the right to access experimental treatments in the future, especially for other genetic treatments.
🔬 Key People and Decisions in Charlie Gard
The key people involved in the Charlie Gard case included Charlie's parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard; the doctors at GOSH who were treating Charlie; and the judges who ruled on the case in the UK courts.
Charlie's parents fought to keep their son alive and to seek experimental treatment in the United States. They argued that they had the right to make decisions about their child's medical care and that this treatment offered a potential chance at improving Charlie's condition.
The doctors at GOSH, on the other hand, believed that further treatment would be futile and would cause Charlie unnecessary suffering. They followed established medical guidelines and the advice of medical experts in recommending the withdrawal of life support.
The UK courts ultimately ruled in favour of the doctors and authorised the withdrawal of life support, citing evidence that the experimental treatment was unlikely to be effective and could cause Charlie unnecessary suffering. This decision was appealed by Charlie's parents, but their appeal was ultimately unsuccessful.
💼 Charlie Gard Case Ethics & Considerations
Charlie Gard Ethics
The case of Charlie Gard raises a number of important ethical considerations that are important to think about for your medical school interview, including the balance between the rights of parents and the role of the government and NHS in making medical decisions, the use of experimental treatments, and the allocation of medical resources at a population and individual level.
1) Protecting Best Interests
One key ethical consideration in the Charlie Gard case is the balance between the rights that parents have to make decisions about their child's medical care, and the role of the government in protecting the best interests of individuals who may not be able to make decisions for themselves.
In this case, Charlie's parents argued that they had the right to seek experimental treatment for their son, despite the objections of the doctors and the UK courts. What do you think about this?
2) Experimental Treatments
Another key ethical consideration in the Charlie Gard case is the use of experimental treatments. Charlie's parents sought permission to take him to the United States for nucleoside bypass therapy, which is a still-experimental treatment for Charlie's rare genetic disorder.
How can the government justify such cases on an individual level, when the money could be spent helping more people across the UK? Is this a decision that should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis?
3) Distributive Justice & Autonomy
The Charlie Gard case also raises important questions about distributive justice and autonomy.
Distributive justice refers to the allocation of resources, including medical resources, in a fair and equitable manner. In the case of Charlie Gard, the question of whether it was fair to allocate limited medical resources, such as access to experimental treatment, to one individual at the expense of others was a key ethical consideration and something you could get asked about at the interview.
Autonomy - refers to an individual's right to make decisions for themselves, including decisions about their own medical care. In the Charlie Gard case, the question of whether Charlie's parents had the right to make decisions about their child's medical care, even if those decisions were different to the recommendations of medical professionals is something that was prominent throughout the ongoing debate.
These ethical considerations highlight the complex and delicate nature of the Charlie Gard case, and the need for careful thought and consideration when making decisions about medical care, particularly in difficult and emotionally fuelled situations.
👉🏻 Read more: Answering Medicine Ethics Questions
👉🏻 Read more: NHS Questions at the Medicine Interview
💬 Medicine Interview Questions & Answers on the Charlie Gard Case
Can you discuss the ethical implications of the Charlie Gard case for the medical profession?
Model Answer
“The Charlie Gard case raised a number of ethical questions for the medical profession and NHS in the UK, particularly in regard to end-of-life decision-making and the rights of parents in medical decision-making.
One of the key ethical implications of the case is the need for clear communication and collaboration between medical professionals, patients, and their families in making difficult decisions. In the Charlie Gard case, there was significant disagreement between Charlie's parents and the doctors treating him over the best course of action, leading to a prolonged and highly publicised legal battle.
Another ethical implication of the case is the need to balance respecting the autonomy of patients and their families, and the role of the state in protecting the best interests of individuals who may not be able to make decisions for themselves. Charlie’s parents argued that they had the right to make the decision about Charlie’s health, rather than leaving it up to his doctors.
This is an important issue, as it highlights the need for patients and their families to have a say in treatment decisions – even if the doctors disagree. In the Charlie Gard case, the UK courts ultimately ruled in favour of the doctors and authorised the withdrawal of life support, despite the objections of Charlie's parents.
In terms of distributive justice, and remaining fair to the entire population, the question of whether it was fair to allocate limited medical resources, such as access to experimental treatment, to one individual at the expense of others was a key ethical consideration.
In the Charlie Gard case, the question of whether Charlie's parents had the right to make decisions about their child's medical care, even if those decisions were at odds with the recommendations of medical professionals, was a key ethical consideration.
Overall, the Charlie Gard case serves as a reminder of the complex ethical issues that can arise in medical decision-making, and the importance of clear communication and collaboration in addressing these challenges.”
👉🏼 Read More: Medicine Interview Questions Guide
Interview Question: In your opinion, who was right in the Charlie Gard case – the parents or the doctors?
Example Answer
It is difficult to say that one party was definitely "right" or "wrong" in the Charlie Gard case, as both the parents and the doctors involved were acting in what they thought were the best interests of the child.
From the perspective of the doctors, they were following established medical guidelines and the advice of medical experts in recommending the withdrawal of life support for Charlie. They believed that further treatment would be futile and would cause the child unnecessary suffering.
From the perspective of the parents, they were fighting for their right to make decisions about their child's medical care, something that they felt was a right that all parents should have. They believed that experimental treatment in the United States offered a potential chance at improving Charlie's condition, and they were willing to exhaust all options to give their child a fighting chance.
Ultimately, the courts ruled in favour of the doctors and authorised the withdrawal of life support, despite the objections of Charlie's parents. While this decision may be seen as supporting the actions of the doctors, it is important to recognise that the situation was complex and nuanced and that both parties were acting out of love and concern for the child.
👉🏻 Read more: Answering Medicine Ethics Questions
Question: How would you approach a similar situation if you were a doctor?
Example Answer
“If I were a doctor in a situation like the Charlie Gard case, I would first prioritise the welfare of the patient and try to make a decision that is in their best interests. I would carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of any treatment options, and I would involve the patient and their family in the decision-making process. I would also consult with other healthcare professionals such as my senior colleagues and specialists for their input and advice. Ultimately, my goal would be to make a decision that is in the best interests of the patient, while also respecting the rights and wishes of their family.”
Charlie Gard Ethical Questions
The Charlie Gard case raises several important questions for medical ethics, including the following:
How should the interests of the patient be balanced against those of the parents in medical decision-making?
What is the appropriate role of the state in making decisions about medical treatment for children?
When should life-sustaining medical treatment be withdrawn, and who should make that decision?
How should scarce medical resources be allocated in cases where multiple patients are in need of treatment?
How should doctors and other medical professionals handle situations where their personal beliefs conflict with their professional duties?
👉🏻 Read more: MMI Medicine Interview Tips Guide
Charlie Gard Medical School Interview Questions Examples
Can you discuss the Charlie Gard case and its ethical implications for the medical profession?
During the Charlie Gard case, who was right – the parents or the doctors?
How did the Charlie Gard case raise questions about the balance between the rights of parents and the role of the state in making medical decisions?
In what ways did the Charlie Gard case highlight the need for clear communication and collaboration between medical professionals, patients, and their families?
How did the public response to the Charlie Gard case illustrate the emotional impact of end-of-life decision-making?
What were the main arguments made by Charlie's parents in support of their right to seek experimental treatment for their son?
How did the UK courts rule in the Charlie Gard case, and what were the reasons for their decision?
What was the outcome of the Charlie Gard case, and how has it continued to be relevant in discussions about medical ethics?
How did the Charlie Gard case compare to other high-profile cases involving medical decision-making and the rights of parents?
In what ways can the Charlie Gard case serve as a cautionary tale for medical professionals, patients, and their families in dealing with difficult end-of-life decisions?
👉🏻 Read more: 280 Common Medicine Interview Questions
Overall, the Charlie Gard case can provide a valuable opportunity to reflect on the ethical challenges that can arise in medicine and to demonstrate your ability to think critically about these issues.
Frequently Asked Questions on the Charlie Gard Case for Medicine Interviews
1. What Was the Core Issue in the Charlie Gard Case?
The central issue revolved around whether Charlie Gard should be allowed to undergo experimental treatment in the U.S. or have life support withdrawn as recommended by the UK doctors. The case brought up ethical questions about parental rights, medical advice, and the role of the state in healthcare decisions.
2. Who Were the Main Parties Involved in the Charlie Gard Case?
The key stakeholders were Charlie's parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, the medical team at Great Ormond Street Hospital, and the UK courts that made the final decisions.
3. What Is Mitochondrial DNA Depletion Syndrome?
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome is a rare genetic disorder causing muscle weakness, developmental delays, and severe impairments in abilities like movement and breathing.
4. What Was the Proposed Experimental Treatment for Charlie?
The treatment, known as Nucleoside Bypass Therapy (NBT), aimed to restore the body's ability to produce RNA and DNA, potentially improving symptoms and prolonging life.
5. How Did the Public Respond to the Charlie Gard Case?
The case gained significant attention both nationally and internationally, with high-profile figures like the Pope expressing support for Charlie's parents.
6. What Ethical Considerations Did the Charlie Gard Case Bring Up?
The case raised questions about the balance between parental rights and medical advice, the allocation of limited medical resources, and end-of-life decision-making.
7. What Was the Final Court Ruling in the Charlie Gard Case?
The UK courts ruled in favour of the hospital, authorizing the withdrawal of life support. The decision was upheld despite appeals from Charlie's parents.
8. What Are the Implications of the Charlie Gard Case for Future Medical Ethics Cases?
The case serves as a precedent for similar ethical dilemmas, emphasizing the need for clear communication between medical professionals and families, and the role of the state in healthcare decisions.
9. What Is the Charlie Gard Foundation?
Established by Charlie's parents, the foundation aims to support other families facing similar situations, especially those seeking access to experimental treatments for genetic disorders.
10. How Can the Charlie Gard Case Prepare Me for Medicine Interviews?
Understanding the complexities of the Charlie Gard case can help you prepare for questions on medical ethics and decision-making in your medicine interviews.
Get help today from expert interview tutors for both Panel & MMI Interviews
Check out our Medicine Interview Tutoring and Interview Question Bank which has over 400 medicine questions and answer guides for your practice.
